What is a common risk assessment technique?

A common risk assessment technique involves both qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. This approach allows organizations to evaluate risks in a structured manner.

Qualitative analysis focuses on subjective assessment, which involves human judgment to evaluate the impact and likelihood of various risks. It often uses descriptive categorization and can involve interviews, surveys, and brainstorming sessions to gather insights on potential vulnerabilities and threats.

Quantitative analysis, on the other hand, uses numerical values and statistical methods to assess risks. This may include metrics like loss estimates, probability figures, and other data-driven indicators to provide a more precise understanding of risk exposure and potential impacts.

By using both qualitative and quantitative methods, organizations can obtain a comprehensive view of the risks they face, enabling informed decision-making regarding security measures, resource allocation, and strategic planning. This dual approach enhances the overall effectiveness of the risk management process, offering a balance between subjective insights and objective data.

The other choices, while part of good security practices, do not directly represent risk assessment techniques. Installing antivirus software and regularly changing passwords are important for maintaining security but do not assess risk per se. Similarly, implementing user training sessions improves awareness and preparedness, yet it falls under enhancing security posture rather than assessing risks.